Skip to main content

Journal of Pediatric, Maternal & Family Health

Chiropractic

Home
Subscribe
Subscriber Login
Current & Past Issues
Newsletter
Resources
Information for Authors
Biographies
Editorial Board
Continuing Education
Support
Press Room
McCoy Press Journals
McCoy Press Home
McCoy & Associates
Subscriber LogonFull Text PDF

Back to Vol. 2009

Back to Vol. 2010


Commentary

 

Cobb’s Angle in Scoliosis – Gold Standard or Golden Calf?

A Commentary on Scoliosis Outcome Assessments

 

Mark Morningstar, D.C. Bio  Clayton Stitzel, D.C. Bio

 

Journal of Pediatric, Maternal & Family Health - Chiropractic ~ Volume 2010 ~ Issue 1 ~ Pages 6-10
 
Abstract

 

The purpose of this paper is to discuss why Cobb’s angle should not be the Gold Standard for radiographic evaluation of scoliosis. While Cobb’s angle has been the subject of numerous reliability studies, there are several disadvantages to be noted.  These disadvantages range from high inter-examiner variability to lack of validity.  Cobb’s angle is oftentimes only as good as the film it is drawn upon. There are various alternative methods that involve measuring the Cobb angle as well as its rotational component. Since chiropractors are particularly focused on obtaining radiographic evidence of treatment success, the profession at large should use radiographic analytical methods that provide more information on the presenting three-dimensional spine and spinal disorder.

 

Key Words: Chiropractic, scoliosis, Cobb angle, radiograph, x-ray, mensuration

 


Subscriber LogonFull Text PDF

Back to Vol. 2009

Back to Vol. 2010